Fade contours: rethink fashion in fluid terms

Fade contours: rethink fashion in fluid terms

There are those who look in the mirror and recognize themselves perfectly in the reflected image,  others who instead would like to be the exact opposite of what they are. In the middle, then, there  are those who every day change expectations about themselves, but do not live with discomfort their  body, nor would they like to change: they just want to be recognized in its perpetual change. 

If previous generations had already made considerable efforts to speak up for the concept of  diversity, the fierce members of the fresh Generation Z want a real revolution: the gender one. One of the oldest legacies that have been handed down to us is that of the female/male dichotomy:  something that for many is very natural, but that makes pawing who in that distinction does not see  what is . For this reason the concept of fluidity has been introduced, according to which gender is no  longer a given and unchangeable construct, indeed, masculine and feminine become the extreme  poles of a continuum within which every person can move freely, changing the expression of his or  her self in time and depending on situations: one day you can feel more men, another more women,  other times both, others yet neither. 

For years now there has been a process of normalization of these changes, to the point that , who  until a few years ago did not even know the expression "gender fluid", today he is no longer shocked  at the sight of a man with enamel and dressed in clothes considered generally feminine (or at least,  not too much). 

Speaking of clothes: what better language, if not that of fashion, to tell this new rampant fluid identity? Overcoming, in fact, the now ancestral cliché that "men’s things" and "women’s things" still exist,  many important fashion houses, acting as a reflection prism for the transformations taking place in  society, have been working for a long time to make the boundaries between genres increasingly  

blurred, presenting collections with clothing items ideally intended for him and her. This is how fluid fashion is born, in which widths, shapes and volumes are released from stereotypes  and adapt to changes, with soft and relaxed silhouettes, which no longer feel the need to define a  certain genre. 

It is no longer just about the possibility of having free access to the wardrobe of those who belong  to the other sex (so, in fact, the distinction remains), but rather to conceive of a fashion to all dumb,  that no longer provides fences and that crosses every border: it is not a man to dress as a woman  or a woman as a man, but a person who chooses to wear what he wants, beyond any sterile  convention.

https://www.pinterest.it/pin/45247171230373974/ 

Already Coco Chanel had, almost unconsciously, a first no-gender intuition when, determined to  make women’s lives easier by freeing them from wearing impractical skirts around the clock, she  introduced the suit with trousers for them too. 

However, the first true forerunner of this revolutionary movement was, in unsuspecting times, Giorgio  Armani, who, since the 1980s, began to think in "fluid" terms by dressing women in his fashion shows  with deconstructed men’s clothing and jackets.

But if already forty years ago the father of Italian fashion legitimized the use of men’s clothes for  women, thus contributing to their emancipation, what is now experiencing is something, if possible,  even more difficult: make men’s fashion more feminine. 

Gucci in this is one of the most important names, especially under the brilliant artistic direction of  Alessandro Michele: in 2020, when the House has been advocating for years the motto «Future is  fluid», is created, in collaboration with some artists of the LGBTQIA+ community, The MX collection,  suitable for all genres presented with these words: «Gucci collections aim to deconstruct  preconceived dualism and question how these concepts are reflected on our bodies. Exaltation of  self-expression in the name of gender equality, Maison presents MX». The highlight of the project is  the reinterpretation of the iconic Jackie 1961, the design of which, according to Michele’s own  statement, «surpasses traditional classifications, with its versatility and its non binary essence». 

https://www.instagram.com/p/CDB1ldYCmxy/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=

Exaltation of self-expression and equality the key words for Gucci, but not only. While Stella  McCartney creates Shared, a capsule collection in which Stella, letting the codes of men’s tailoring  flow into the female wardrobe, creates a line of unisex pieces designed for a shared wardrobe, John  Galliano for Maison Margiela thins season after season the border between man and woman to  completely cancel it with the creation of a special genderless bag that pays tribute to the new  generations with their values of diversity and inclusiveness. Nicolas Ghesquière for Louis Vuitton  already in 2016 began to glimpse the potential of fluidity in fashion, so much so that, using the face  of Jaden Smith for an advertising campaign in which she wears a knee-length skirt, declares that for  the young actor son of art to be in those clothes «it is natural, as it would be for a woman to wear a  trench coat or a tuxedo.» 

https://www.instagram.com/p/BAIGeQ1S9Xt/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y= 

Not only Haute Couture, but also Fast Fashion rethinks its collections in genderless terms: an  example of cross-dressing is given by the Denim Wo(Man) line by Zara, or from the collection born 

from the collaboration of Billie Eilish with Bershka and composed of basic and oversize garments,  the same that the singer wears while «claiming I wear what I want to wear. I have no established  rules». 

ù

https://www.instagram.com/p/CFOvflMBDny/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y= 

If fashion thought in these terms until not many years ago could have been bizarre even in the eyes  of designers, today more than ever it is necessary to ride the wave of changes that new generations  are imposing and that have all the flavor of the future. Otherwise, we risk remaining crystallized in a  past that, by now, has run its course.